End Citizens United Stresses the Importance of Re-evaluating the Rules on Campaign Financing

A number of reports have confirmed the role played by a company in Russia in influencing the U.S. presidential elections of 2016. The company that is closely associated with Kremlin bought advertisements, which are believed to have influenced the outcome of the election. As much as funding by foreign entities is not allowed in the U.S., it seems the election laws were not applied since Russia managed to influence the last elections intricately and extensively.

Investigations on the Matter

Robert Mueller, a special counsel, has been handed the responsibility of determining whether the Trump team worked in cahoots with the Russians. End Citizens United believes in the capabilities of the Special Counsel and believes that he will unearth the truth of the matter. However, the political action committee is not confident that Washington has the will to stop the interventions by foreigners on U.S. elections going forward. End Citizens United further claims that politicians from the right-wing and their cronies have continuously sabotaged the laws on campaign finance. This has enabled donors with deep pockets to use inordinate amounts during elections to further their causes and give their preferred candidates an edge over their competitors.

Need for Reforms

End Citizens United has referred to the recent interference by a foreign government in the country’s presidential elections as one of the major reasons why reforms on election laws are necessary. The PAC argues that the interference demonstrated how weak the U.S. election laws are and need to be fixed as soon as possible. End Citizens United is calling for speedy reforms as it is not only the foreign governments the country ought to be worried about but also billionaires and large corporations who are well connected to politicians. These parties can influence their election to further their cause using their money.

It is not yet clear how much money was spent by the Russian company and sadly this will not be the last time. End Citizens United is calling for reforms in order to make smooth various technicalities in law that allow large corporations, super PACs and billionaires to spend lots of money on politics without care. The group claims that the law enforcement agencies are not doing enough to stop the big money influence on politics. There are so many cases of money being used to influence elections but Washington only lacks the will to do something about it.

About End Citizens United

End Citizens United has embarked on a mission to see the end of big money politics in America. The PAC wants to improve the current system, which it considers to have been rigged. End Citizens United is hoping to achieve its plan by endorsing democrats who have shown an interest in bringing about reforms in campaign finance to Congress. They aim to bring an end to the decision that allowed untraceable and unlimited donations in politics.

To know more visit @: www.factcheck.org/tag/end-citizens-united/

End Citizens United Role In Maintaining The Rule Of Law

James Bopp is the founder of End Citizens United. He has been working to ensure that the organization succeeds. At one time, Mr. Bopp was laughed at when appearing before the federal judge. All those present in that court including the judge and jury laughed at some of his submissions. The counsel appearing for End Citizen United was pleading with the judge on why his client should be allowed the rights to play a video. The one and a half hours film were featuring the former Democrat presidential candidate, Mrs. Hillary Clinton. The content of the film was about the campaigning procedure alongside other procedures of running elections.

The film focused on Hillary Clinton as a ruthless and western schemer. Once the film was released to the general public for viewing, the authorities placed a caveat on the production, distribution and displaying of the video. The authorities concentrated on the length of the film to discontinue further activities revolving around the video. The film was therefore declared too long to serve the intended purpose.

Bopp acting on behalf of the End Citizen United was aggrieved by the federal resolution to ban the video according to theatlantic.com. He, therefore, went ahead and lodged a petition at the US federal court. In his arguments, Bopp submitted that the film was no different from the usual sixty minutes movie. The judge upon hearing the comparison burst out laughing together with all those present in the court. Bopp was pleading with the judge to invoke the first amendment rights of the content creators before the caveat could take effect.

Follow End Citizens United on Twitter

The federal judge in his final determination, ruled against the End Citizen United line of argument. Still determined to seek legal redress, moved to the Supreme Court to challenge the decision of the lower court. And two years later, no one was smiling when the apex court overturned the conclusion of the lower court. Under the doctrine of stare decisis, the apex court had made a case law on how funding in campaigns should be done.

After the decision, James Bopp and his organization the End Citizens United is determined to make sure that all the campaign laws are reviewed. The agenda behind the change of law is guided by the letter and spirit of the constitution, the rule of law and the desire to uphold the underlying bill of rights.

The End Citizens United is determined to change the various laws that are made in very obscure and sloppy cases. The firm has invested in research, and they are committed to ensuring that they win on every aspect of the fact that they file. Despite the various achievements that the firm has achieved, James Bopp argues that the company will not stop until all the unfavorable laws are repealed.

Search more about End Citizens United: https://ballotpedia.org/End_Citizens_United_PAC

Charles Koch Takes a Stand

There are few people who are in the news right now more than Donald Trump. He has done a great job of capturing the attention of America. However, there are a lot of people who disagree with everything that he has to say right now. Over the long term, it will be interesting to see if he fades away or if he continues to work on how he gets votes. One of the people who is against Donald Trump is Charles Koch. Although they work in a similar field, they really do not see eye to eye when it comes to working with others. Over the course of his career, he has been able to ad value to a number of people. There are a lot of ways that Koch wants to impact others.

One of the biggest reasons that Donald Trump is in the lead for the GOP nomination is the fact that he has tapped into the anger of people across the country. There are a lot of people who are looking for someone who is not afraid to say things that everyone else is thinking. There are a lot of people in the political arena who only say things to get votes. There are many people who simply want to get things from the government and Donald Trump speaks out against that. One of the things that Charles really does not agree with is how Donald Trump speaks out against people who are not from this area. There are a lot of great immigrants in the United States who have contributed greatly to the country. Charles Koch does not want people to feel discriminated against simply because of how they got to the country.

There are a lot of people who criticize Charles Koch for speaking out against Donald Trump. Trump has formed a following of people who are against the establishment. For some reason, no matter what he says his followers believe him. It was a very brave thing for Charles Koch to speak out against Donald Trump and how he treats people of different backgrounds. Over a long period of time, it will be interesting to see if his support goes down from his followers or if he continues to poll well in national polls. This is one of the craziest elections in modern history, and Koch is right in the middle of it.